The post Dr William Bird and Stephen McPeake • Tech and Games that Create Health appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

The post Anna König Jerlmyr, (F) Mayor Stockholm • The Rise of 7000-step city appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• The central problem is the way road danger is talked about. Current framing often minimizes car dominance, shifts blame to vulnerable road users, and normalizes an unsafe system.
• Cities do not just need safer streets; they need better communication about what streets are for, who they are for, and who is being harmed by the current system.

Summary

1. Road safety messaging is often weak:
   • • The dominant narrative has been built around driver convenience, risk normalization, and pedestrian blame.
     • Automotive marketing is emotionally powerful and often normalizes recklessness, big vehicles, and street dominance.
     • Safety messaging for people outside cars often does the opposite: it blames pedestrians, tells children to protect themselves, and uses weak or forgettable public campaigns.
2. Cities and advocates should stop treating communications as an afterthought and instead use it as part of the road safety strategy itself.
   • • It is possible to move from generic safety messaging to sharper, more human, and more persuasive public narratives by reshaping public understanding of road safety and active transportation.
     • Advocacy can alter what people consider normal, acceptable, or radical. Wanting children to walk to school safely is not radical; accepting road violence is.
     • An effective approach is to use messaging that is:
       • emotionally direct,
       • simple,
       • human-centered, and
       • aimed at mainstream audiences rather than already-convinced advocates.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Reframe road safety as road violence prevention, not just traffic management:
   • • Review existing safety campaigns, police messaging, and municipal communications for blame language, moralizing, and false equivalence.
     • Replace “be careful” and “share the road” style messaging with language that names systemic responsibility and infrastructure failure.
2. Develop simple, emotionally strong materials that are easy for mainstream audiences to understand:
   • • Different messages are needed for parents, drivers, elected officials, school communities, and the general public.
     • Posters, short videos, billboards, social posts, stickers, and site-specific signage can be more effective than dense technical communication.
3. Create public-facing campaigns that show the ordinary absurdity of current street conditions.
   • • Use real stories and the faces of victims to ensure the issue is not abstracted into statistics alone.

Ideas for future research

1. Study how people interpret terms like “road violence,” “road safety,” “safe streets,” and “active transportation” across different political and cultural contexts.
2. Evaluate whether child-centered messaging increases support for street redesign more than general safety messaging.

The post Tom Flood • Remarketing our Roads appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Plans alone are not enough. Building a Sustainable City requires work that combines urban design with institution-building, policy-making, and development management systems.
• The strongest approach is not copy-paste importation of successful models, but collaboration that adapts global ideas through local culture.

Summary

1. The mission in Abu Dhabi aimed to reposition the emirate as a global leader in sustainable, livable, and resilient development. That goal was pursued through two parallel moves: first, designing urban plans and district designs; second, building the institutional and policy base needed to implement them.
2. Legacy urban forms, mobility cultures, and social hierarchies evolve more slowly than plans.  They thus, require long-term, adaptive strategies rather than one-time interventions.
3. Key learnings from the process:
   • • Understanding political and operational drivers is more important than technical competence in early planning phases.
     • Imported models fail without cultural translation. Western planning principles (density, mixed-use, walkability) had to be adapted to privacy norms (courtyard housing), social practices (guest hosting, Ramadan dynamics), and settlement patterns.
     • Ecological frameworks should define urban expansion limits before development begins. The desert, coast, mangroves, dunes, and oasis systems were treated as organizing conditions for urban form.
     • Introducing community engagement via adapted local practices led to faster alignment and fewer downstream conflicts.
     • Climate-responsive design must be embedded at all scales.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Create or strengthen a planning authority, delivery unit, or development management system at the same time as the plan. Otherwise, the plan remains aspirational.
2. Cities in hot, cold, wet, or flood-prone environments should make climate the starting point of street and district design.
3. Separate new-build and retrofit strategies. New communities are easier to shape; older downtowns need different tools, more compromise, and more time. Cities should not assume the same tactic works everywhere.

Ideas for future readings

1. Planning the Future of Abu Dhabi: A Canadian-Emirati Collaboration for Sustainable Urbanism – Book by Larry Beasley and Michael White.

The post Larry Beasley, Michael White • Planning the Future of Abu Dhabi appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Treat Mobility as Social Infrastructure, Not Transport
• Most older adults who move into care facilities indirectly move out of everyday public life and into invisibility. Programs such as Cycling Without Age keep older adults in the rhythm of the city, not outside it.

Summary

1. Purpose:
   • • reduce isolation, reinsert older people into everyday community life, and create a shared civic experience
     • the program also aims to convert older adults from being treated as passive recipients of care into active contributors with time, energy, and social value.
2. How does the program restore mobility, social connection, and joy of life for older adults who can no longer move around independently?
   • • It provides trishaw rides for older adults from care homes or private homes, using volunteers as pilots.
     • It builds local hubs and works through community coordinators so the program can be organized, repeated, and sustained.
     • It creates intergenerational participation, including volunteers across different age groups riding together.
     • It partners with care homes, municipalities, local businesses, schools, cafes, hairdressers, and social media networks to embed the program in everyday city life.
     • It uses a decentralized model, so local chapters can adapt the program to their own context rather than copying a rigid template.
     • It treats volunteering as a managed system, supported by the four pillars: quality, continuity, love, and culture.
3. Outcomes:
   • • What began as one ride in Copenhagen became a program in 41 countries with roughly 50,000 volunteers.
     • Older adults are often framed as dependent, even when many have time, energy, and a desire to contribute. Cycling Without Age converts that latent capacity into public value through volunteering, coordination, and ritualized participation. 
     • Volunteers, especially older men, gain purpose, companionship, structure, and identity.
     • The program was associated with a higher self-perceived quality of life among participants and volunteers.
     • A Danish public health study showed quality-of-life scores rising from 7.0 to 7.9 after participation.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Use an age-friendly policy not just to reduce barriers, but to create reasons to be out in the city.
2. Use mobility as a tool to rebuild participation by linking movement with loneliness prevention, care, and neighborhood activation.
3. Treat social connection as infrastructure and create low-threshold opportunities for older adults to be outside, seen, and socially connected.
4. Make intergenerational contact a core design principle: intergenerational contact can normalize aging, build empathy, and create social learning on both sides.

Interesting resources and readings

1. Cycling Without Age: https://cyclingwithoutage.org/ 
2. PBS’s Joyride series. https://watch.btpm.org/show/joyride/ 
3. Starting and Operating a Cycling Without Age Chapter in a Care Facility. https://prod-ms-be.lib.mcmaster.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/1f3043ac-b23c-4f50-891d-7290ae47e435/content 
4. Jørgensen, A., Petersen, C. B., Eghøj, M., & Toftager, M. (2021). When Movement Moves: Study Protocol for a Multi-Method Pre/Post Evaluation Study of Two Programmes; the Danish Team Twin and Cycling Without Age. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10008. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910008

Ideas for future research

1. Measure how Cycling Without Age affects loneliness, depression, and sense of belonging among older adults over time.
2. Compare the program’s impact in highly cycle-oriented cities versus car-dependent cities.

The post Ole Kassow and Pernille Vedersø Bussone • Cycling Without Age: The Right to Wind in Your Hair appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Communications for urban projects must be integrated from day one. Treat communications as a project process, not a last-minute add-on, and seat comms staff at the steering table.
• Tailor messages to segmented audiences such as residents, cyclists, businesses, and commuters. One umbrella slogan is useful, but content and channels must vary.
• Communication is not finished at ‘opening/project launch’. Sustained post-implementation presence and monitoring are necessary to observe how behaviours and uses evolve.

Summary

1. For communicating project proposals, changes, and approaches, use a two-layer approach simultaneously:
   • • Focus on service information related to operations, hyper-local, street-level changes. This makes people feel supported at all times.
     • Incorporate benefits in city-branding — long-horizon narrative that links projects into a coherent vision.
2. Successful urban change requires:
   • • an operationally rigorous communications process from day one; 
     • audience segmentation and service-level staffing on the street; 
     • a parallel narrative/branding campaign that explains long-term benefits; and 
     • creative use of partners when budgets are small.
3. Where opposition is intense, consider a targeted ‘silence + local accompaniment’ tactic. Withdraw noisy defence campaigns and invest in small-scale, hands-on problem-solving on the ground.
4. Budget limits require stakeholder mapping. Find trade channels through repair shops, associations, tax mailings, etc. and co-use them as distribution channels instead of buying mass media.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Embed comms in governance: assign at least one communications specialist to the project steering group from the concept stage.
2. Use realistic renderings, quick before/after photo campaigns, and simple outcome metrics for visual proof & evaluation.
3. Create tailored messages and channels per stakeholder: residents, businesses, school parents, cyclists, drivers, utilities, and media.
4. Include field tests with neighbours in pre-launch preparations, along with advocacy/awareness tactics and audience-specific briefings.

Interesting resources

1. Barcelona Superblock program website https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/superilles/en 
2. Barcelona Superblock report https://bcnroc.ajuntament.barcelona.cat/jspui/bitstream/11703/132999/1/SUPERBLOCK.pdf

The post Maite Peris • Turning Conflict into Trust: Communication Strategies for Urban Transformation appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Globally, women have taken leading roles in several rapid and systemic changes ranging from tactical interventions and programmatic scaling to policy instruments and social provisioning. Their leadership patterns emphasize empathy, long-term vision, care, alliance-building and prioritizing impact over power.
• Female perspectives are not a niche addition. Diverse experiences, needs and leadership styles are fundamental to creating inclusive cities.

Summary

1. Key examples of urban transformation:
   • • Montreal, Canada: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the mayor initiated a seasonal pedestrianization program. 11 shopping and commercial streets were closed to cars for months to allow businesses to continue operating in a socially distanced way.
     • Paris, France: Mayoral leadership expanded a targeted school-streets program to over 200 sites in under five years and is now part of the mobility network. Similarly, the city advanced protected bike routes to reclaim curb space and reduce car dominance. 
     • Brussels, Belgium: Good move initiative that used traffic calming and circulation measures to filter out 40% of through traffic passing through the city centre by putting planter boxes to create a blanket 30 km/h speed limit and expanding pedestrianized networks. 
     • Barcelona, Spain: Superblock initiative that created outdoor living rooms, giving the public space back to people, creating space for play, and creating an environment that supports children’s independent mobility.
     • Sydney, Australia: The city had only 15km of protected bike lanes before COVID-19. But within one year after the pandemic, they built 150 km of protected lanes, and now the city is on its way to becoming a full-blown cycling city through the leadership of the mayor and the bicycle program managers.
     • Delhi, India: A city with immense challenges around the dominance of men in public spaces and restricted movement of women and girls, saw the rise of a social enterprise through the Safetipin initiative that uses technology and crowdsourced data to map safety scores and dark spots in the city, aiding urban planning and decision-making.
     • Bogota, Colombia: Expansion of the cycling network beyond affluent areas to make sure that everyone has more equitable transportation access. Additionally, the Care Blocks program paired mobility hubs with childcare, laundry and training to unlock carers’ (mostly women’s) labour-market access.
     • Manila, Philippines: When the city shut down its public transit, a woman activist initiated pop-up lanes that, through workshops and partnerships (including the Dutch Cycling Embassy and the World Bank), scaled to ~500 km of permanent cycling infrastructure.
     • Tirana, Albania: Given the high proportion of young people and families, city planners started looking at the city from a children’s perspective. Initiatives included the expansion of the school streets program, providing mobility options for people who don’t drive, creating all-ages playgrounds, and creating environments that welcome children and young girls to spend time in the city.
     • Kampala, Uganda: Persistent advocacy by a young woman produced pop-up bike lanes during COVID-19, which were later converted to permanent non-motorized corridors. She also self-funded a university bike-share system to seed demand and usage.
2. Scaling programs requires policy instruments such as speed defaults, parking/storage rules, budget allocation, coalition-building with businesses, caregivers, NGOs, etc., and reframing solutions through children-first and gender-inclusive narratives.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Pair quick tactical wins with institutional partners such as city transport, NGOs, international partners, etc., to secure technical backing.
2. Mandate short evaluation windows with predefined success metrics (usage increase, speed reduction, perceived safety), then update design manuals and budgets when pilots pass thresholds, and create a cross-department steering group (transport, public health, parks, schools) for successful scaling.

Ideas for further reading

1. Women Changing Cities: Global Stories of Urban Transformation- Book by Chris Bruntlett and Melissa Bruntlett
2. Curbing Traffic: The Human Case for Fewer Cars in Our Lives – Book by Chris Bruntlett and Melissa Bruntlett
3. Building the Cycling City: The Dutch Blueprint for Urban Vitality – Book by Chris Bruntlett and Melissa Bruntlett

Ideas for further research

1. Evaluate the Care Blocks program’s effect on women’s employment and time poverty in Latin American pilot sites.
2. Distil reproducible sequences that female leaders used to scale interventions in contexts with weak administrative capacity.

The post Chris & Melissa Bruntlett • Women Changing Cities: Global Stories of Urban Transformation appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• We must re-centre cities through a children’s lens. Car-first systems shrink childhood independence and harm equity.
• Children are a persuasive lens for political change because they reveal inequities and make the case for reclaiming public space for people.
• We must create conditions for people to experience the streets differently, and attitude change will follow.

Summary

1. Child-wellbeing as a planning and mobility issue:
   • • The motor era normalized car-first streets and children confined to supervised, car-dependent routines.
     • Children spend more time on screens because they can’t get the experiences they are looking for, such as a free and safe environment and the ability to move around freely, in real life.
     • Restoring children’s independent mobility and access to diverse local destinations requires coordinated systemic change across policy, design, and budgets, not only isolated programmes.
     • Historical evidence and contemporary country case studies show that when governments set mobility and street norms differently, children travel more safely and freely.
2. Two-dimensional framework for child-friendly places:
   • • variety/choice of destinations, and children’s independent mobility.
     • Both must score well to achieve child-friendly neighbourhoods.
3. System-level policy levers and best practices:
   • • In the 1970s, the Danish government introduced a national policy that required municipalities to make it easier for children to walk and cycle to school. Odense, the third largest city in Denmark, became a national demonstration city with a 500 km cycle network and 40% of children cycling to school. 
     • In the 1960s – 70s, Japan established regulations that allowed people to buy a car only if they could show that they stored it off the street. As a result, streets in Japanese cities, even in the dense, busy parts of those cities, are quiet, civilized, and convivial places; and young children can use streets and public transport on their own.
     • The country of Wales lowered the default speed limit in many local streets five years ago, which led to 20–25% casualty reductions and lower insurance premiums.
     • Spatial and land-use fixes, i..e, reducing land consumed by car storage and co-housing schemes, frees space for play and walking.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Adopt a children-first metric in street and transport planning:
   • • Require projects to score both on children’s mobility and on local destination variety.
     • Reduce speeds by default on residential/local streets and adopt systematic 20/30 km/h policies where children live and play.
     • Institutionalize school-streets and supervised play-streets as scalable programmes.
2. Launch public communications to reframe motonormativity:
   • • Use children’s stories and visible, everyday benefits to shift public opinion about streets as public spaces.
     • Build cross-sector coalitions (parents, schools, public health, environmental groups, youth organizations) and use children-first stories to counter pushback.
3. Invest capital in low-cost spatial retrofits that favor shorter crossings, tightened turning radii, play-backed public realms and continuous active-travel corridors.
4. Reallocate curb and storage space, require off-street car storage, expand shared car parking, and convert parking footprints to public space.

Ideas for further reading

1. Urban Playground: How Child-Friendly Planning and Design Can Save Cities – Book by Tim Gill
2. All to Play For: How to Design Child-friendly Housing – Book by Dinah Bornat
3. Movement: How to Take Back Our Streets and Transform Our Lives – Book by Marco te Brömmelstroet and Thalia Verkade
4. The Anxious Generation – Book by Jonathan Haidt
5. Mattioli, G., Roberts, C., Steinberger, J. K., & Brown, A. (2020). The political economy of car dependence: A systems of provision approach. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101486

Ideas for further research

1. Map children’s activity deserts, crash hotspots, parking appropriation and areas of concentrated socioeconomic vulnerability in a city and measure children’s independent mobility.
2. Evaluate cities/countries that adopted national/local regulatory levers (Denmark, Wales, Japan) to identify which elements drove change for child-friendly streets and how transferable they are.

The post Tim Gill • Last Child in the Street? Building the case for cities that truly put kids before cars appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Streets are the largest continuous public spaces in cities. They are an underused asset for health, equity, and climate goals.
• Treat streets as places for people first, i.e., walking, play, commerce, social life, and not solely for moving cars.

Summary

1. Street Design Strategies per the Global Street Design Guide by GDCI:
   • • Ensure Universal Accessibility
     • Design for Safe Speeds
     • Accommodate Diverse Uses
     • Develop Context-Driven Solutions
     • Act Now – Start Somewhere.
     • Reconfigure the Space
2. Cities designed for cars harm public life globally:
   • • Over 1 million traffic deaths
     • Over 90% of people breathe polluted air
     • Over 80% of adolescents (age 11 – 17) do not meet the recommended daily physical activity standards.
3. Lessons:
   • • Start with temporary pop-ups and interim treatments, then scale when pilots prove successful.
     • Measure and communicate pilot success through before/after visuals and quantitative and qualitative data such as usage increase, pollution reduction, perceived safety, etc., to create the political case.
     • Include cross-disciplinary professionals beyond planners and engineers. Include journalists, enforcement officers, school communities and local businesses to reduce political resistance and sustain projects.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Prioritize human needs by shortening crossings, tightening turning radii, adding protected cycle space, and creating plazas and play spaces outside schools.
2. Pair physical change with programming such as markets, seating, school activities, and play events to activate and normalize new uses.
3. Engage communities early-on in projects: treat citizens as experts, learn from their experiences, and plan with them for the best results.
4. Measure pilot success intentionally:
   • • Identify high-value test sites with visible, narratable impact: school fronts, neighborhood main streets, and unsafe intersections.
     • Collect baseline and post-intervention data for vehicle speeds, conflict observations, and pollution where feasible. 
     • Use simple survey instruments for perceived safety and usage.
     • Share results publicly with stories and images.
     • Use pilot success data to update local street design manuals and budget proposals.

Ideas for further reading

1. Global Street Design Guide by GDCI
2. GDCI Resources: https://globaldesigningcities.org/guides-publications/

Ideas for further research

1. Comparative analysis of neighborhoods/sites that moved from pop-up to permanent changes: identify political, technical and financial inflection points.
2. Track physical activity and respiratory outcomes in neighborhoods with before/after street transformations.

The post Skye Duncan and Fabrizio Prati • GDCI • Streets Reimagined: for People and Planet appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Built environment, such as protected lanes, nearby shops, open schoolyards, tree canopy, etc., shapes human behaviour and daily choices.
• Good intentions, campaigns, policy advice, etc, fail unless the situation is changed to make living healthier an easy choice.
• Healthier diets, sufficient sleep, social connection, regular contact with nature, and everyday physical activity are the five top priorities that enable healthier outcomes at the neighborhood scale.

Summary

1. We need cities that are fun. The library, the sidewalks, the parks – everything that is free should be joyful to attract and retain citizens.
2. Situation modification delivers behaviour change:
   • Well-being is achieved when city design and policy choices remove friction for healthy routines and lifestyles.
   • A few examples of situational modifications include proximity to necessities; safe, slow streets; programmed public spaces; tree equity; and multipurpose uses for communities.
   • Irrespective of the city size, when you start thinking at the neighborhood scale, the same solutions can be applied and scaled.
3. Examples of strong political will and strategic decisions:
   • Bogota’s Open streets / Ciclovia- an open streets program that grew through repeated programming and rapid cultural change.
   • Paris’s cycling culture – rapid rollout of protected bike lanes during the COVID-19 pandemic after a mayoral directive.
   • Seoul’s Cheonggyecheon Restoration Project – removal of a 5.6-kilometer (3.5-mile) elevated highway built over the buried Cheonggyecheon stream, and creating a new open space.
   • Mexico’s ban on junk food in schools – schools were asked to adapt their kitchens within six months to serve healthier foods and make chips, sodas, and sugary snacks off-limits on campus.
4. Practical solutions:
   • 30km/h as the maximum speed limit in urban areas
   • 3-30-300 tree rule – park within 300 meters, 30% canopy target in neighborhoods, and a minimum of 3 trees visible from homes.
   • Open schoolyards as a community space after school hours and on weekends
   • Flexible work hours to reduce congestion, better work-life balance, and increase productivity.
   • Noise level limitations in neighborhoods
   • Design cities that work for an eight-year-old and an eight-year-old.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Aim to plan for neighborhood-level proximity that reduces car trips, increases physical activity, and incentivizes the local economy.
2. Design an inclusive, connected network of protected lanes that serves all ages and abilities to promote mode-shift to walking and cycling.
3. Slow streets pilot for residential and school areas.

Ideas for further reading

1. The 3-30-300 Rule for Urban Forestry and Greener Cities by Cecil Konijnendijk. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353571108_The_3-30-300_Rule_for_Urban_Forestry_and_Greener_Cities 
2. Best practice in boosting cycling modal share and creating safe, sustainable cities. https://urban-mobility-observatory.transport.ec.europa.eu/resources/case-studies/best-practice-boosting-cycling-modal-share-and-creating-safe-sustainable-cities_en

Ideas for further research

1. Experiment situation-change: Deploy tactical interventions in a neighborhood and measure change in modal share, physical activity, social contact, etc.
2. Pilot a school-yard program opening it as a community space after school hours and on weekends, and measure physical activity in the community, social interactions, and elders’ participation in social life.

The post Gil Penalosa • Well+Being: Good Intentions are Not Enough appeared first on Gil Penalosa.