The post Dr William Bird and Stephen McPeake • Tech and Games that Create Health appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Healthy Cities are built neighborhood by neighborhood. Urban planning needs to be strategic for housing, infrastructure, and risk management; however, that approach is incomplete without bottom-up neighborhood planning shaped by residents’ needs. The neighborhood revolution sits at the intersection of climate action, public health, and social inclusion.
• Daily exposures to heat, pollution, walking conditions, food access, and social contact are experienced more frequently at the local level than at the citywide scale.
• Neighborhood transformation can deepen inequality if benefits are concentrated in already advantaged areas or if upgrading leads to displacement.

Summary

1. Neighborhood improvements are more than just beautification processes:
   • • They should improve health, mobility, the local economy, and social inclusion at the same time.
     • Tactical urbanism should be used as a method, not an endpoint. Temporary interventions are useful because they allow cities and communities to test ideas cheaply, reveal hidden problems, and build evidence for more permanent investment.
     • Community participation should not be treated as consultation after the fact. Communities should be involved in diagnosis, co-design, implementation, and sometimes even maintenance.
2. Built form is directly linked to public health. More walking, better access to green space, reduced traffic danger, more shade, lower heat exposure, and better access to food and basic services can all improve health.
3. Neighborhood interventions are strongest when they combine physical design, social participation, and institutional continuity. A few examples include:
   • • Rio de Janeiro
       • The Oswaldo Cruz Urban Lab worked through a participatory process with schools, residents, neighborhood associations, quilombo communities, municipal actors, and university partners. 
       • The project moved through co-creation, design validation, implementation, evaluation, and activation. 
       • Its outputs were small-scale but multi-layered. Widened sidewalks, crosswalks, murals, community gardens, planting beds, new seating, and local fabrication of urban furniture were built through repeated community involvement and a strong link between municipal action and neighborhood knowledge.
     • Nairobi
       • The Dunga Road Renewal Project approached the street as a lived social space, not just a traffic corridor. 
       • The process began with women and girls assessing access, safety, comfort, and environmental conditions, which is important because their day-to-day experience of the street revealed issues that a purely technical traffic survey might miss. 
       • Young artists then translated those observations into temporary interventions like murals, seating around a tree, protections for exposed roots, and a bench integrated with the boda-boda environment. 
       • The project found that people were already creating informal pedestrian crossings because the formal street design did not serve them. That observation led to the creation of a formal crosswalk and related public realm improvements.
     • Buenos Aires
       • In Vicente López, the healthy food project used neighborhood scale to address access to nutritious food. 
       • The intervention was built around creating a network of local producers and healthy shops; generating demand through workshops in schools, kindergartens, and community centers; and activating the neighborhood through events that made the new supply visible and socially desirable.
       • The most important outcome was the durable commercial relationships that led to shops permanently carrying products from local producers.
       • The project shows how a health-oriented project can also rewire local supply chains.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Run co-creation processes with residents, schools, local businesses, women, youth, and community organizations.
2. Pair design pilots with monitoring so cities can learn what changed in use, safety, comfort, and local commerce.
3. Involve multiple departments from the start: planning, mobility, public works, environment, health, education, and culture.
4. Use local procurement and local labor where possible, so neighborhood upgrades also support local economic activity.
5. Build scaling logic into the pilot. The goal should not be to produce one attractive site; it should be to create a repeatable method.

Ideas for future research

1. Study what makes pilots scale and measure how informal or unplanned behavior can change formal design.
2. Investigate the displacement risk of neighborhood upgrading, especially when successful interventions increase desirability in already pressured housing markets.

The post Hélène Chartier • The Neighborhood Revolution • Shaping Healthy Cities appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Treat Mobility as Social Infrastructure, Not Transport
• Most older adults who move into care facilities indirectly move out of everyday public life and into invisibility. Programs such as Cycling Without Age keep older adults in the rhythm of the city, not outside it.

Summary

1. Purpose:
   • • reduce isolation, reinsert older people into everyday community life, and create a shared civic experience
     • the program also aims to convert older adults from being treated as passive recipients of care into active contributors with time, energy, and social value.
2. How does the program restore mobility, social connection, and joy of life for older adults who can no longer move around independently?
   • • It provides trishaw rides for older adults from care homes or private homes, using volunteers as pilots.
     • It builds local hubs and works through community coordinators so the program can be organized, repeated, and sustained.
     • It creates intergenerational participation, including volunteers across different age groups riding together.
     • It partners with care homes, municipalities, local businesses, schools, cafes, hairdressers, and social media networks to embed the program in everyday city life.
     • It uses a decentralized model, so local chapters can adapt the program to their own context rather than copying a rigid template.
     • It treats volunteering as a managed system, supported by the four pillars: quality, continuity, love, and culture.
3. Outcomes:
   • • What began as one ride in Copenhagen became a program in 41 countries with roughly 50,000 volunteers.
     • Older adults are often framed as dependent, even when many have time, energy, and a desire to contribute. Cycling Without Age converts that latent capacity into public value through volunteering, coordination, and ritualized participation. 
     • Volunteers, especially older men, gain purpose, companionship, structure, and identity.
     • The program was associated with a higher self-perceived quality of life among participants and volunteers.
     • A Danish public health study showed quality-of-life scores rising from 7.0 to 7.9 after participation.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Use an age-friendly policy not just to reduce barriers, but to create reasons to be out in the city.
2. Use mobility as a tool to rebuild participation by linking movement with loneliness prevention, care, and neighborhood activation.
3. Treat social connection as infrastructure and create low-threshold opportunities for older adults to be outside, seen, and socially connected.
4. Make intergenerational contact a core design principle: intergenerational contact can normalize aging, build empathy, and create social learning on both sides.

Interesting resources and readings

1. Cycling Without Age: https://cyclingwithoutage.org/ 
2. PBS’s Joyride series. https://watch.btpm.org/show/joyride/ 
3. Starting and Operating a Cycling Without Age Chapter in a Care Facility. https://prod-ms-be.lib.mcmaster.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/1f3043ac-b23c-4f50-891d-7290ae47e435/content 
4. Jørgensen, A., Petersen, C. B., Eghøj, M., & Toftager, M. (2021). When Movement Moves: Study Protocol for a Multi-Method Pre/Post Evaluation Study of Two Programmes; the Danish Team Twin and Cycling Without Age. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10008. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910008

Ideas for future research

1. Measure how Cycling Without Age affects loneliness, depression, and sense of belonging among older adults over time.
2. Compare the program’s impact in highly cycle-oriented cities versus car-dependent cities.

The post Ole Kassow and Pernille Vedersø Bussone • Cycling Without Age: The Right to Wind in Your Hair appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Loneliness, when looked at as an urban condition, not only a personal or clinical one, shows that the core problem is often disconnection rather than physical distance.
• Cities should respond to loneliness by designing for spaces and conditions that prevent it from becoming chronic in the first place.
• Belonging should be treated as a measurable urban outcome. We must create places where people feel they are allowed to stay, not pressured to perform,  immediately socialize, or simply pass by.

Summary

1. Loneliness emerges through several linked losses: weaker family structures, disappearing third spaces, increasing digital isolation, and urban systems that no longer generate ordinary encounters. The response, therefore, cannot be a single program. It has to work across housing, streets, programming, and governance.
2. Layers of Proximity:
   • • Physical proximity, including density, housing, and mobility
       • Homes should be understood as places that can either intensify isolation or support belonging, especially in dense urban contexts. 
       • People can live densely surrounded by others and still feel deeply disconnected. 
       • Co-housing, vertical communities, and building layouts that encourage encounters can materially affect belonging.
     • Functional proximity, including access, design, and movement
       • Small everyday moments, such as meeting someone at a shop, on the street, or in a shared space, are important social infrastructure.
     • Social proximity, including programming, community, and social health
       • Designing low-pressure spaces where people can simply be present without expectation.
       • Better belonging can improve mental health, reduce disconnection, and strengthen neighborhood life.
     • Emotional proximity, including safety, feeling seen, and mental health impact
       • Familiar faces, repeated presence, and low-threshold entry reduce fear of rejection and help people move from observer to participant.
3. Interventions:
   • • Downstream interventions – responding after loneliness  appears:
       • Social Prescribing
       • Therapy and Clinical Support
       • Community Program and Targeted Interventions
     • Upstream interventions – shaping conditions before loneliness emerges:
       • Designing everyday encounter spaces
       • Housing as social infrastructure
       • Human-scale streets and slow mobility
4. Shift in framing:
   • • The wrong question is, how do we help lonely people reconnect after the fact? 
     • The better question is, how do we create environments where connection naturally occurs?

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Urban planners, architects, health professionals, and community actors should work together to address the spatial and social conditions that produce loneliness, rather than leaving the issue solely to health services.
2. Start with a local loneliness audit that maps where people are likely to encounter others, where they are structurally isolated, and where social infrastructure has disappeared.
3. Prioritize small, repeated, low-pressure interventions over one-off events.
4. Pair physical interventions with programming and stewardship so spaces do not remain empty shells.

Interesting resources

1. The Paradox of Proximity: Preventing Urban Loneliness – Book by Ann-Britt Elvin Andersen. https://bloxhub.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/TheParadoxOfProximity_digital.pdf 
2. Seoul Without Loneliness, The Seoul Metropolitan Government’s Social Isolation Prevention Center. https://english.seoul.go.kr/seoul-policy-archive/seoul-without-loneliness/

The post Ann-Britt Elvin Andersen • Unlonely Cities: How Urban Systems can both Produce and Prevent loneliness appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Communications for urban projects must be integrated from day one. Treat communications as a project process, not a last-minute add-on, and seat comms staff at the steering table.
• Tailor messages to segmented audiences such as residents, cyclists, businesses, and commuters. One umbrella slogan is useful, but content and channels must vary.
• Communication is not finished at ‘opening/project launch’. Sustained post-implementation presence and monitoring are necessary to observe how behaviours and uses evolve.

Summary

1. For communicating project proposals, changes, and approaches, use a two-layer approach simultaneously:
   • • Focus on service information related to operations, hyper-local, street-level changes. This makes people feel supported at all times.
     • Incorporate benefits in city-branding — long-horizon narrative that links projects into a coherent vision.
2. Successful urban change requires:
   • • an operationally rigorous communications process from day one; 
     • audience segmentation and service-level staffing on the street; 
     • a parallel narrative/branding campaign that explains long-term benefits; and 
     • creative use of partners when budgets are small.
3. Where opposition is intense, consider a targeted ‘silence + local accompaniment’ tactic. Withdraw noisy defence campaigns and invest in small-scale, hands-on problem-solving on the ground.
4. Budget limits require stakeholder mapping. Find trade channels through repair shops, associations, tax mailings, etc. and co-use them as distribution channels instead of buying mass media.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Embed comms in governance: assign at least one communications specialist to the project steering group from the concept stage.
2. Use realistic renderings, quick before/after photo campaigns, and simple outcome metrics for visual proof & evaluation.
3. Create tailored messages and channels per stakeholder: residents, businesses, school parents, cyclists, drivers, utilities, and media.
4. Include field tests with neighbours in pre-launch preparations, along with advocacy/awareness tactics and audience-specific briefings.

Interesting resources

1. Barcelona Superblock program website https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/superilles/en 
2. Barcelona Superblock report https://bcnroc.ajuntament.barcelona.cat/jspui/bitstream/11703/132999/1/SUPERBLOCK.pdf

The post Maite Peris • Turning Conflict into Trust: Communication Strategies for Urban Transformation appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Play is a fundamental part of human nature. It is not only for children. Older adults across the globe already play in diverse ways.
• Practitioners and decision-makers must reconsider social infrastructure to include play for older adults.
• ‘Play’ produces measurable benefits that directly address health, social and cognitive risks of later life.

Summary

1. Reframing Aging:
   • • Conversations around aging usually focus on health issues, healthcare costs, caregiving burdens, dementia, depression, etc. However, there is much more to later life than challenges.
     • Social constructions of age and play limit acceptable older adult play to stoic, passive, safe, and largely sedentary ‘leisure activities’.
     • Dr Hartt’s research shows that older adults across the globe already play in diverse ways, but the design, policy and research needed to amplify such activities are missing.
2. Benefits of incorporating ‘play’ in the city’s social and physical fabric:
   • • Play improves physical fitness, mental well-being, and community relations.
     • It decreases the risks of heart disease and diabetes.
     • For older adults, ‘play’ is not just an activity. It is an expression of self and freedom.
3. Design principles:
   • • Practical, low-cost, and spatial design tactics can make public and private environments more inviting for later-life play.
     • Design thresholds and edges between uses. People value the in-between spaces for watching activities and spontaneous interactions.
     • Play should be equitable. Removing structural barriers for low-income and underrepresented groups needs targeted research and programming.
     • Mainstreaming play into planning, health, and aging policy requires cross-sector coalitions.
     • Examples of playful interventions include:
     • • Purposeful, whimsical landmarks in the public realm, such as playful bollards, public pianos, book benches, big stair slides;
       • Expanding the ideas of playfulness to private space and making boundaries permeable;
       • Private / front-yard activation.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Integrate play into age-friendly policy and health plans.
2. Require play considerations in public-realm design guidelines, health promotion strategies and community grants.
3. Install a pop-up playful feature for days/weeks. Pair with place activation and basic monitoring (observations, short intercept surveys). Use before-after results for scaling ideas.
4. Launch inclusive programming and outreach in low-income neighbourhoods to identify structural barriers and opportunities for equitable play.

Ideas for further reading

1. Aging Playfully: Reimagining the Possibilities of Age-Friendly Community Planning – Book by Maxwell D. Hartt
2. Global Aging Playfully Society. https://globalagingplayfullysociety.com/

Ideas for further research

1. Measure older adults’ physical activity, cognitive function, social connectedness and healthcare utilization pre/post implementation of ‘playful urban interventions’ in select neighbourhoods.
2. Measure benefits vs. adverse events related to ‘risky play’ and refine safety-risk tradeoffs for older adults.

The post Dr Maxwell Hartt • Aging Playfully: Reimagining the Possibilities appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Built environment, such as protected lanes, nearby shops, open schoolyards, tree canopy, etc., shapes human behaviour and daily choices.
• Good intentions, campaigns, policy advice, etc, fail unless the situation is changed to make living healthier an easy choice.
• Healthier diets, sufficient sleep, social connection, regular contact with nature, and everyday physical activity are the five top priorities that enable healthier outcomes at the neighborhood scale.

Summary

1. We need cities that are fun. The library, the sidewalks, the parks – everything that is free should be joyful to attract and retain citizens.
2. Situation modification delivers behaviour change:
   • Well-being is achieved when city design and policy choices remove friction for healthy routines and lifestyles.
   • A few examples of situational modifications include proximity to necessities; safe, slow streets; programmed public spaces; tree equity; and multipurpose uses for communities.
   • Irrespective of the city size, when you start thinking at the neighborhood scale, the same solutions can be applied and scaled.
3. Examples of strong political will and strategic decisions:
   • Bogota’s Open streets / Ciclovia- an open streets program that grew through repeated programming and rapid cultural change.
   • Paris’s cycling culture – rapid rollout of protected bike lanes during the COVID-19 pandemic after a mayoral directive.
   • Seoul’s Cheonggyecheon Restoration Project – removal of a 5.6-kilometer (3.5-mile) elevated highway built over the buried Cheonggyecheon stream, and creating a new open space.
   • Mexico’s ban on junk food in schools – schools were asked to adapt their kitchens within six months to serve healthier foods and make chips, sodas, and sugary snacks off-limits on campus.
4. Practical solutions:
   • 30km/h as the maximum speed limit in urban areas
   • 3-30-300 tree rule – park within 300 meters, 30% canopy target in neighborhoods, and a minimum of 3 trees visible from homes.
   • Open schoolyards as a community space after school hours and on weekends
   • Flexible work hours to reduce congestion, better work-life balance, and increase productivity.
   • Noise level limitations in neighborhoods
   • Design cities that work for an eight-year-old and an eight-year-old.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Aim to plan for neighborhood-level proximity that reduces car trips, increases physical activity, and incentivizes the local economy.
2. Design an inclusive, connected network of protected lanes that serves all ages and abilities to promote mode-shift to walking and cycling.
3. Slow streets pilot for residential and school areas.

Ideas for further reading

1. The 3-30-300 Rule for Urban Forestry and Greener Cities by Cecil Konijnendijk. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353571108_The_3-30-300_Rule_for_Urban_Forestry_and_Greener_Cities 
2. Best practice in boosting cycling modal share and creating safe, sustainable cities. https://urban-mobility-observatory.transport.ec.europa.eu/resources/case-studies/best-practice-boosting-cycling-modal-share-and-creating-safe-sustainable-cities_en

Ideas for further research

1. Experiment situation-change: Deploy tactical interventions in a neighborhood and measure change in modal share, physical activity, social contact, etc.
2. Pilot a school-yard program opening it as a community space after school hours and on weekends, and measure physical activity in the community, social interactions, and elders’ participation in social life.

The post Gil Penalosa • Well+Being: Good Intentions are Not Enough appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

⇢ Both natural and urban destinations suffer degradation when visitor numbers exceed the capacity of their core assets, i.e., ecosystems in nature and local way of life in cities.
⇢ Overtourism leads to housing displacement (Airbnb conversion), public‑realm crowding (streets, transport), amenity strain (water, energy, green space) and loss of social cohesion.
⇢ Visitors can mitigate impact—favor local businesses, avoid global chains, research labor standards, and engage respectfully with community needs.

Summary

a. Tourism pressure on local lives:

○ 90 % of visitors focus on areas such as the historic old town and waterfront promenade, amplifying crowding, noise and congestion in a footprint that was once designed only to serve residents’ daily lives.
○ Airbnb‑style rentals and hotel conversions remove thousands of units from the local market and make the remaining too expensive for locals to rent or own.
○ International food chains drive business away from local markets, impacting the local economy.

b. Many cities set quantitative visitor‑capacity limits; however, the priorities are not aligned or coordinated across municipal, regional and national levels, leading to ad‑hoc advertisement and limitations.

c. Case of San Sebastian:

○ Over the past 14 years, San Sebastián’s evolution from a modest food‑and‑beaches destination into an international magnet has strained its urban fabric.
○ A small city of 188 K residents now hosts over 1 million overnight visitors plus day‑trippers annually—driving a 10 % daily population surge and 50 % growth in tourist beds (2017–2023).
○ In San Sebastián, two‑thirds of people under 35 still live with parents because the average price of housing is around €6 000/m², owing to the increasing market price due to Airbnbs and other similar tourist apartments.
○ Cruising ships bring a flock of tourists who only consume and contribute to emissions but do not contribute to the local economy because they live, eat, and spend money on the cruise.

d. Regenerative tourism: we need initiatives to ensure tourism income is redistributed and reinvested in town and benefit locals.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

a. Set quantitative visitor‑capacity limits with policy alignment at national, regional, and local level.

b. Regulate short‑term rentals: freeze new licences and convert existing units only via conditional permits tied to local need.

c. Synchronize regulations on cruise calls, land‑use and transport.

d. Introduce or boost tourist taxes and earmark 100 % for public transport, green‑space maintenance and housing subsidies.

Ideas for further reading

a. Tourism and Sustainability: Development, globalisation and new tourism in the Third World – Book by Martin Mowforth, Ian Munt.

b. García Hernández, M., Ivars Baidal, J., & Mendoza de Miguel, S. (2019). Overtourism in urban destinations: the myth of smart solutions. *Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles*. DOI: 10.21138/bage.2830.

The post Victor Lasa • The Challenge of Sustainable Urban Tourism. Case: San Sebastian, Spain appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

• • School Streets can be successfully implemented in cities of all sizes, from small to
    large metropolises – making them an adaptable solution for creating safer, healthier
    neighborhoods.
  • Safe, pedestrianized school zones help reduce traffic and air pollution, making the
    environment healthier for children.
  • School Streets are part of a larger strategy to reduce car dependency, lower
    greenhouse gas emissions, and promote active transportation.

Summary

1. 1. Understanding School Streets
      • Repurpose the urban space surrounding schools, transforming car-dominated streets into vibrant, safe, and pedestrian-friendly zones.
      • These initiatives are designed to make it easier for children to walk to school and for communities to reclaim public space.
      • They encourage physical activity, social interaction, and a sense of community belonging.
      • These spaces become community hubs where parents, teachers, and local businesses engage, thereby revitalizing the neighborhood.
   2. How do we design and implement School Streets?
      • Organizing events, playgrounds, and educational activities such as children voting on game designs, tree-planting events with explanatory signage, and educational content displayed as art.
      • Design elements like child-scaled benches, open and accessible sidewalks, and clear, light-colored pavements enhance usability.
      • Temporary measures such as gates and tactical street closures provide a low-cost testing ground.
      • Traffic management adjustments, such as reconfiguring traffic flows and reducing vehicle lanes, are essential for a successful transition.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. 1. Prioritize streets where pedestrian flow is hindered by vehicles and where children are most at risk.
   2. Adjust local traffic maps to reroute through-traffic away from school zones.
   3. Begin with tactical interventions (temporary closures, movable gates) as pilot projects.
   4. Launch communication campaigns to educate residents about the benefits of reduced traffic, improved safety, and enhanced public spaces.

Interesting resources

1. 1. Paris School Streets Program
   2. Barcelona School Street Program
   3. School Streets create healthy, playful and more social environments by Jordi Honey-Rosés – https://citylabbcn.org/school-streets-create-healthy-and-social-environments/
   4. Impact assessment “We protect schools”: Impact assessment on pacified school environments in the city of Barcelona for the “Let’s Protect Schools” program 2021-2022 – https://www.isglobal.org/ca/-/avaluacio-impacte-protegim-escoles-barcelona#:~:text=L’estudi%20t%C3%A9%20com%20objectiu,comunitat%2C%20les%20percepcions%20de%20les

Ideas for further reading

1. 1. School Streets for Safe and Sustainable School Trips – https://urban-mobility-observatory.transport.ec.europa.eu/resources/case-studies/school-streets-safe-and-sustainable-school-trips_en
   2. Let’s Protect Schools: Evaluation of the Peaceful Environments of the City of Barcelona’s 2021 – https://portalrecerca.uab.cat/en/publications/protegim-les-escoles-avaluaci%C3%B3-dels-entorns-pacificats-del-progra
   3. Streetfight: Handbook for an Urban Revolution – Book by Janette Sadik-Khan and Seth Solomonow
   4. School Streets: Putting Children and The Planet First – by Child Health Initiative’s Advocacy Hub

The post Priscilla Benedetti, Jordi Honey-Rosés • School Streets: Enhancing Neighborhoods in Paris & Barcelona appeared first on Gil Penalosa.