Presenter did not allow to share video

The post Jay Pitter • Black Public Joy: No Permit or Permission Required appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Movement is a basic determinant of human health that city design can either support or suppress.
• The 7000-step city is a design concept that makes movement the default choice in everyday life choices.

Summary

1. Urban form and built environment shape physical and mental health:
   • • Walking is not just about sidewalks, but also about comfort, safety, mixed use, shade, active frontages, places to pause, and public transport integration.
     • Hidden stairs, fast elevators, car-first streets, blank walls, lack of benches, and poor shade make walking seem secondary.
     • Walking, nature, social contact and exploration are factors impacting emotional and social well-being and happiness.
2. Investment in walkability and greening must not stay concentrated in already advantaged areas but instead be inclusive and equitable.
3. Small interventions such as benches, stairs, crossings, school-yard improvements, parks and street redesign can all extend healthy years.
4. Copenhagen, Paris, Bogota, and Singapore are all best-case examples that designed cities around people’s everyday rhythm and capacity to enable walking as a lifestyle choice.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Strengthen mixed-use neighborhood planning so that people have reasons to walk.
2. Prioritize neighborhood-scale interventions in places where inactivity, loneliness, heat exposure, and poor access are most severe.
3. Connect parks and green corridors into a citywide walking network.
4. Integrate walking into public transport planning so that the first and last parts of a journey are designed as part of the system.

Ideas for future research

1. How to measure the combined effect of walkability on health, loneliness, and social participation?
2. How do bench spacing, shade, and resting opportunities affect mobility for older adults?

The post Anna König Jerlmyr, (F) Mayor Stockholm • The Rise of 7000-step city appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Healthy Cities are built neighborhood by neighborhood. Urban planning needs to be strategic for housing, infrastructure, and risk management; however, that approach is incomplete without bottom-up neighborhood planning shaped by residents’ needs. The neighborhood revolution sits at the intersection of climate action, public health, and social inclusion.
• Daily exposures to heat, pollution, walking conditions, food access, and social contact are experienced more frequently at the local level than at the citywide scale.
• Neighborhood transformation can deepen inequality if benefits are concentrated in already advantaged areas or if upgrading leads to displacement.

Summary

1. Neighborhood improvements are more than just beautification processes:
   • • They should improve health, mobility, the local economy, and social inclusion at the same time.
     • Tactical urbanism should be used as a method, not an endpoint. Temporary interventions are useful because they allow cities and communities to test ideas cheaply, reveal hidden problems, and build evidence for more permanent investment.
     • Community participation should not be treated as consultation after the fact. Communities should be involved in diagnosis, co-design, implementation, and sometimes even maintenance.
2. Built form is directly linked to public health. More walking, better access to green space, reduced traffic danger, more shade, lower heat exposure, and better access to food and basic services can all improve health.
3. Neighborhood interventions are strongest when they combine physical design, social participation, and institutional continuity. A few examples include:
   • • Rio de Janeiro
       • The Oswaldo Cruz Urban Lab worked through a participatory process with schools, residents, neighborhood associations, quilombo communities, municipal actors, and university partners. 
       • The project moved through co-creation, design validation, implementation, evaluation, and activation. 
       • Its outputs were small-scale but multi-layered. Widened sidewalks, crosswalks, murals, community gardens, planting beds, new seating, and local fabrication of urban furniture were built through repeated community involvement and a strong link between municipal action and neighborhood knowledge.
     • Nairobi
       • The Dunga Road Renewal Project approached the street as a lived social space, not just a traffic corridor. 
       • The process began with women and girls assessing access, safety, comfort, and environmental conditions, which is important because their day-to-day experience of the street revealed issues that a purely technical traffic survey might miss. 
       • Young artists then translated those observations into temporary interventions like murals, seating around a tree, protections for exposed roots, and a bench integrated with the boda-boda environment. 
       • The project found that people were already creating informal pedestrian crossings because the formal street design did not serve them. That observation led to the creation of a formal crosswalk and related public realm improvements.
     • Buenos Aires
       • In Vicente López, the healthy food project used neighborhood scale to address access to nutritious food. 
       • The intervention was built around creating a network of local producers and healthy shops; generating demand through workshops in schools, kindergartens, and community centers; and activating the neighborhood through events that made the new supply visible and socially desirable.
       • The most important outcome was the durable commercial relationships that led to shops permanently carrying products from local producers.
       • The project shows how a health-oriented project can also rewire local supply chains.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Run co-creation processes with residents, schools, local businesses, women, youth, and community organizations.
2. Pair design pilots with monitoring so cities can learn what changed in use, safety, comfort, and local commerce.
3. Involve multiple departments from the start: planning, mobility, public works, environment, health, education, and culture.
4. Use local procurement and local labor where possible, so neighborhood upgrades also support local economic activity.
5. Build scaling logic into the pilot. The goal should not be to produce one attractive site; it should be to create a repeatable method.

Ideas for future research

1. Study what makes pilots scale and measure how informal or unplanned behavior can change formal design.
2. Investigate the displacement risk of neighborhood upgrading, especially when successful interventions increase desirability in already pressured housing markets.

The post Hélène Chartier • The Neighborhood Revolution • Shaping Healthy Cities appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• The central problem is the way road danger is talked about. Current framing often minimizes car dominance, shifts blame to vulnerable road users, and normalizes an unsafe system.
• Cities do not just need safer streets; they need better communication about what streets are for, who they are for, and who is being harmed by the current system.

Summary

1. Road safety messaging is often weak:
   • • The dominant narrative has been built around driver convenience, risk normalization, and pedestrian blame.
     • Automotive marketing is emotionally powerful and often normalizes recklessness, big vehicles, and street dominance.
     • Safety messaging for people outside cars often does the opposite: it blames pedestrians, tells children to protect themselves, and uses weak or forgettable public campaigns.
2. Cities and advocates should stop treating communications as an afterthought and instead use it as part of the road safety strategy itself.
   • • It is possible to move from generic safety messaging to sharper, more human, and more persuasive public narratives by reshaping public understanding of road safety and active transportation.
     • Advocacy can alter what people consider normal, acceptable, or radical. Wanting children to walk to school safely is not radical; accepting road violence is.
     • An effective approach is to use messaging that is:
       • emotionally direct,
       • simple,
       • human-centered, and
       • aimed at mainstream audiences rather than already-convinced advocates.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Reframe road safety as road violence prevention, not just traffic management:
   • • Review existing safety campaigns, police messaging, and municipal communications for blame language, moralizing, and false equivalence.
     • Replace “be careful” and “share the road” style messaging with language that names systemic responsibility and infrastructure failure.
2. Develop simple, emotionally strong materials that are easy for mainstream audiences to understand:
   • • Different messages are needed for parents, drivers, elected officials, school communities, and the general public.
     • Posters, short videos, billboards, social posts, stickers, and site-specific signage can be more effective than dense technical communication.
3. Create public-facing campaigns that show the ordinary absurdity of current street conditions.
   • • Use real stories and the faces of victims to ensure the issue is not abstracted into statistics alone.

Ideas for future research

1. Study how people interpret terms like “road violence,” “road safety,” “safe streets,” and “active transportation” across different political and cultural contexts.
2. Evaluate whether child-centered messaging increases support for street redesign more than general safety messaging.

The post Tom Flood • Remarketing our Roads appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Plans alone are not enough. Building a Sustainable City requires work that combines urban design with institution-building, policy-making, and development management systems.
• The strongest approach is not copy-paste importation of successful models, but collaboration that adapts global ideas through local culture.

Summary

1. The mission in Abu Dhabi aimed to reposition the emirate as a global leader in sustainable, livable, and resilient development. That goal was pursued through two parallel moves: first, designing urban plans and district designs; second, building the institutional and policy base needed to implement them.
2. Legacy urban forms, mobility cultures, and social hierarchies evolve more slowly than plans.  They thus, require long-term, adaptive strategies rather than one-time interventions.
3. Key learnings from the process:
   • • Understanding political and operational drivers is more important than technical competence in early planning phases.
     • Imported models fail without cultural translation. Western planning principles (density, mixed-use, walkability) had to be adapted to privacy norms (courtyard housing), social practices (guest hosting, Ramadan dynamics), and settlement patterns.
     • Ecological frameworks should define urban expansion limits before development begins. The desert, coast, mangroves, dunes, and oasis systems were treated as organizing conditions for urban form.
     • Introducing community engagement via adapted local practices led to faster alignment and fewer downstream conflicts.
     • Climate-responsive design must be embedded at all scales.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Create or strengthen a planning authority, delivery unit, or development management system at the same time as the plan. Otherwise, the plan remains aspirational.
2. Cities in hot, cold, wet, or flood-prone environments should make climate the starting point of street and district design.
3. Separate new-build and retrofit strategies. New communities are easier to shape; older downtowns need different tools, more compromise, and more time. Cities should not assume the same tactic works everywhere.

Ideas for future readings

1. Planning the Future of Abu Dhabi: A Canadian-Emirati Collaboration for Sustainable Urbanism – Book by Larry Beasley and Michael White.

The post Larry Beasley, Michael White • Planning the Future of Abu Dhabi appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Treat Mobility as Social Infrastructure, Not Transport
• Most older adults who move into care facilities indirectly move out of everyday public life and into invisibility. Programs such as Cycling Without Age keep older adults in the rhythm of the city, not outside it.

Summary

1. Purpose:
   • • reduce isolation, reinsert older people into everyday community life, and create a shared civic experience
     • the program also aims to convert older adults from being treated as passive recipients of care into active contributors with time, energy, and social value.
2. How does the program restore mobility, social connection, and joy of life for older adults who can no longer move around independently?
   • • It provides trishaw rides for older adults from care homes or private homes, using volunteers as pilots.
     • It builds local hubs and works through community coordinators so the program can be organized, repeated, and sustained.
     • It creates intergenerational participation, including volunteers across different age groups riding together.
     • It partners with care homes, municipalities, local businesses, schools, cafes, hairdressers, and social media networks to embed the program in everyday city life.
     • It uses a decentralized model, so local chapters can adapt the program to their own context rather than copying a rigid template.
     • It treats volunteering as a managed system, supported by the four pillars: quality, continuity, love, and culture.
3. Outcomes:
   • • What began as one ride in Copenhagen became a program in 41 countries with roughly 50,000 volunteers.
     • Older adults are often framed as dependent, even when many have time, energy, and a desire to contribute. Cycling Without Age converts that latent capacity into public value through volunteering, coordination, and ritualized participation. 
     • Volunteers, especially older men, gain purpose, companionship, structure, and identity.
     • The program was associated with a higher self-perceived quality of life among participants and volunteers.
     • A Danish public health study showed quality-of-life scores rising from 7.0 to 7.9 after participation.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Use an age-friendly policy not just to reduce barriers, but to create reasons to be out in the city.
2. Use mobility as a tool to rebuild participation by linking movement with loneliness prevention, care, and neighborhood activation.
3. Treat social connection as infrastructure and create low-threshold opportunities for older adults to be outside, seen, and socially connected.
4. Make intergenerational contact a core design principle: intergenerational contact can normalize aging, build empathy, and create social learning on both sides.

Interesting resources and readings

1. Cycling Without Age: https://cyclingwithoutage.org/ 
2. PBS’s Joyride series. https://watch.btpm.org/show/joyride/ 
3. Starting and Operating a Cycling Without Age Chapter in a Care Facility. https://prod-ms-be.lib.mcmaster.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/1f3043ac-b23c-4f50-891d-7290ae47e435/content 
4. Jørgensen, A., Petersen, C. B., Eghøj, M., & Toftager, M. (2021). When Movement Moves: Study Protocol for a Multi-Method Pre/Post Evaluation Study of Two Programmes; the Danish Team Twin and Cycling Without Age. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10008. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910008

Ideas for future research

1. Measure how Cycling Without Age affects loneliness, depression, and sense of belonging among older adults over time.
2. Compare the program’s impact in highly cycle-oriented cities versus car-dependent cities.

The post Ole Kassow and Pernille Vedersø Bussone • Cycling Without Age: The Right to Wind in Your Hair appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Loneliness, when looked at as an urban condition, not only a personal or clinical one, shows that the core problem is often disconnection rather than physical distance.
• Cities should respond to loneliness by designing for spaces and conditions that prevent it from becoming chronic in the first place.
• Belonging should be treated as a measurable urban outcome. We must create places where people feel they are allowed to stay, not pressured to perform,  immediately socialize, or simply pass by.

Summary

1. Loneliness emerges through several linked losses: weaker family structures, disappearing third spaces, increasing digital isolation, and urban systems that no longer generate ordinary encounters. The response, therefore, cannot be a single program. It has to work across housing, streets, programming, and governance.
2. Layers of Proximity:
   • • Physical proximity, including density, housing, and mobility
       • Homes should be understood as places that can either intensify isolation or support belonging, especially in dense urban contexts. 
       • People can live densely surrounded by others and still feel deeply disconnected. 
       • Co-housing, vertical communities, and building layouts that encourage encounters can materially affect belonging.
     • Functional proximity, including access, design, and movement
       • Small everyday moments, such as meeting someone at a shop, on the street, or in a shared space, are important social infrastructure.
     • Social proximity, including programming, community, and social health
       • Designing low-pressure spaces where people can simply be present without expectation.
       • Better belonging can improve mental health, reduce disconnection, and strengthen neighborhood life.
     • Emotional proximity, including safety, feeling seen, and mental health impact
       • Familiar faces, repeated presence, and low-threshold entry reduce fear of rejection and help people move from observer to participant.
3. Interventions:
   • • Downstream interventions – responding after loneliness  appears:
       • Social Prescribing
       • Therapy and Clinical Support
       • Community Program and Targeted Interventions
     • Upstream interventions – shaping conditions before loneliness emerges:
       • Designing everyday encounter spaces
       • Housing as social infrastructure
       • Human-scale streets and slow mobility
4. Shift in framing:
   • • The wrong question is, how do we help lonely people reconnect after the fact? 
     • The better question is, how do we create environments where connection naturally occurs?

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Urban planners, architects, health professionals, and community actors should work together to address the spatial and social conditions that produce loneliness, rather than leaving the issue solely to health services.
2. Start with a local loneliness audit that maps where people are likely to encounter others, where they are structurally isolated, and where social infrastructure has disappeared.
3. Prioritize small, repeated, low-pressure interventions over one-off events.
4. Pair physical interventions with programming and stewardship so spaces do not remain empty shells.

Interesting resources

1. The Paradox of Proximity: Preventing Urban Loneliness – Book by Ann-Britt Elvin Andersen. https://bloxhub.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/TheParadoxOfProximity_digital.pdf 
2. Seoul Without Loneliness, The Seoul Metropolitan Government’s Social Isolation Prevention Center. https://english.seoul.go.kr/seoul-policy-archive/seoul-without-loneliness/

The post Ann-Britt Elvin Andersen • Unlonely Cities: How Urban Systems can both Produce and Prevent loneliness appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Communications for urban projects must be integrated from day one. Treat communications as a project process, not a last-minute add-on, and seat comms staff at the steering table.
• Tailor messages to segmented audiences such as residents, cyclists, businesses, and commuters. One umbrella slogan is useful, but content and channels must vary.
• Communication is not finished at ‘opening/project launch’. Sustained post-implementation presence and monitoring are necessary to observe how behaviours and uses evolve.

Summary

1. For communicating project proposals, changes, and approaches, use a two-layer approach simultaneously:
   • • Focus on service information related to operations, hyper-local, street-level changes. This makes people feel supported at all times.
     • Incorporate benefits in city-branding — long-horizon narrative that links projects into a coherent vision.
2. Successful urban change requires:
   • • an operationally rigorous communications process from day one; 
     • audience segmentation and service-level staffing on the street; 
     • a parallel narrative/branding campaign that explains long-term benefits; and 
     • creative use of partners when budgets are small.
3. Where opposition is intense, consider a targeted ‘silence + local accompaniment’ tactic. Withdraw noisy defence campaigns and invest in small-scale, hands-on problem-solving on the ground.
4. Budget limits require stakeholder mapping. Find trade channels through repair shops, associations, tax mailings, etc. and co-use them as distribution channels instead of buying mass media.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Embed comms in governance: assign at least one communications specialist to the project steering group from the concept stage.
2. Use realistic renderings, quick before/after photo campaigns, and simple outcome metrics for visual proof & evaluation.
3. Create tailored messages and channels per stakeholder: residents, businesses, school parents, cyclists, drivers, utilities, and media.
4. Include field tests with neighbours in pre-launch preparations, along with advocacy/awareness tactics and audience-specific briefings.

Interesting resources

1. Barcelona Superblock program website https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/superilles/en 
2. Barcelona Superblock report https://bcnroc.ajuntament.barcelona.cat/jspui/bitstream/11703/132999/1/SUPERBLOCK.pdf

The post Maite Peris • Turning Conflict into Trust: Communication Strategies for Urban Transformation appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• Globally, women have taken leading roles in several rapid and systemic changes ranging from tactical interventions and programmatic scaling to policy instruments and social provisioning. Their leadership patterns emphasize empathy, long-term vision, care, alliance-building and prioritizing impact over power.
• Female perspectives are not a niche addition. Diverse experiences, needs and leadership styles are fundamental to creating inclusive cities.

Summary

1. Key examples of urban transformation:
   • • Montreal, Canada: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the mayor initiated a seasonal pedestrianization program. 11 shopping and commercial streets were closed to cars for months to allow businesses to continue operating in a socially distanced way.
     • Paris, France: Mayoral leadership expanded a targeted school-streets program to over 200 sites in under five years and is now part of the mobility network. Similarly, the city advanced protected bike routes to reclaim curb space and reduce car dominance. 
     • Brussels, Belgium: Good move initiative that used traffic calming and circulation measures to filter out 40% of through traffic passing through the city centre by putting planter boxes to create a blanket 30 km/h speed limit and expanding pedestrianized networks. 
     • Barcelona, Spain: Superblock initiative that created outdoor living rooms, giving the public space back to people, creating space for play, and creating an environment that supports children’s independent mobility.
     • Sydney, Australia: The city had only 15km of protected bike lanes before COVID-19. But within one year after the pandemic, they built 150 km of protected lanes, and now the city is on its way to becoming a full-blown cycling city through the leadership of the mayor and the bicycle program managers.
     • Delhi, India: A city with immense challenges around the dominance of men in public spaces and restricted movement of women and girls, saw the rise of a social enterprise through the Safetipin initiative that uses technology and crowdsourced data to map safety scores and dark spots in the city, aiding urban planning and decision-making.
     • Bogota, Colombia: Expansion of the cycling network beyond affluent areas to make sure that everyone has more equitable transportation access. Additionally, the Care Blocks program paired mobility hubs with childcare, laundry and training to unlock carers’ (mostly women’s) labour-market access.
     • Manila, Philippines: When the city shut down its public transit, a woman activist initiated pop-up lanes that, through workshops and partnerships (including the Dutch Cycling Embassy and the World Bank), scaled to ~500 km of permanent cycling infrastructure.
     • Tirana, Albania: Given the high proportion of young people and families, city planners started looking at the city from a children’s perspective. Initiatives included the expansion of the school streets program, providing mobility options for people who don’t drive, creating all-ages playgrounds, and creating environments that welcome children and young girls to spend time in the city.
     • Kampala, Uganda: Persistent advocacy by a young woman produced pop-up bike lanes during COVID-19, which were later converted to permanent non-motorized corridors. She also self-funded a university bike-share system to seed demand and usage.
2. Scaling programs requires policy instruments such as speed defaults, parking/storage rules, budget allocation, coalition-building with businesses, caregivers, NGOs, etc., and reframing solutions through children-first and gender-inclusive narratives.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Pair quick tactical wins with institutional partners such as city transport, NGOs, international partners, etc., to secure technical backing.
2. Mandate short evaluation windows with predefined success metrics (usage increase, speed reduction, perceived safety), then update design manuals and budgets when pilots pass thresholds, and create a cross-department steering group (transport, public health, parks, schools) for successful scaling.

Ideas for further reading

1. Women Changing Cities: Global Stories of Urban Transformation- Book by Chris Bruntlett and Melissa Bruntlett
2. Curbing Traffic: The Human Case for Fewer Cars in Our Lives – Book by Chris Bruntlett and Melissa Bruntlett
3. Building the Cycling City: The Dutch Blueprint for Urban Vitality – Book by Chris Bruntlett and Melissa Bruntlett

Ideas for further research

1. Evaluate the Care Blocks program’s effect on women’s employment and time poverty in Latin American pilot sites.
2. Distil reproducible sequences that female leaders used to scale interventions in contexts with weak administrative capacity.

The post Chris & Melissa Bruntlett • Women Changing Cities: Global Stories of Urban Transformation appeared first on Gil Penalosa.

Key Takeaways

• We must re-centre cities through a children’s lens. Car-first systems shrink childhood independence and harm equity.
• Children are a persuasive lens for political change because they reveal inequities and make the case for reclaiming public space for people.
• We must create conditions for people to experience the streets differently, and attitude change will follow.

Summary

1. Child-wellbeing as a planning and mobility issue:
   • • The motor era normalized car-first streets and children confined to supervised, car-dependent routines.
     • Children spend more time on screens because they can’t get the experiences they are looking for, such as a free and safe environment and the ability to move around freely, in real life.
     • Restoring children’s independent mobility and access to diverse local destinations requires coordinated systemic change across policy, design, and budgets, not only isolated programmes.
     • Historical evidence and contemporary country case studies show that when governments set mobility and street norms differently, children travel more safely and freely.
2. Two-dimensional framework for child-friendly places:
   • • variety/choice of destinations, and children’s independent mobility.
     • Both must score well to achieve child-friendly neighbourhoods.
3. System-level policy levers and best practices:
   • • In the 1970s, the Danish government introduced a national policy that required municipalities to make it easier for children to walk and cycle to school. Odense, the third largest city in Denmark, became a national demonstration city with a 500 km cycle network and 40% of children cycling to school. 
     • In the 1960s – 70s, Japan established regulations that allowed people to buy a car only if they could show that they stored it off the street. As a result, streets in Japanese cities, even in the dense, busy parts of those cities, are quiet, civilized, and convivial places; and young children can use streets and public transport on their own.
     • The country of Wales lowered the default speed limit in many local streets five years ago, which led to 20–25% casualty reductions and lower insurance premiums.
     • Spatial and land-use fixes, i..e, reducing land consumed by car storage and co-housing schemes, frees space for play and walking.

How can Cities apply these learnings?

1. Adopt a children-first metric in street and transport planning:
   • • Require projects to score both on children’s mobility and on local destination variety.
     • Reduce speeds by default on residential/local streets and adopt systematic 20/30 km/h policies where children live and play.
     • Institutionalize school-streets and supervised play-streets as scalable programmes.
2. Launch public communications to reframe motonormativity:
   • • Use children’s stories and visible, everyday benefits to shift public opinion about streets as public spaces.
     • Build cross-sector coalitions (parents, schools, public health, environmental groups, youth organizations) and use children-first stories to counter pushback.
3. Invest capital in low-cost spatial retrofits that favor shorter crossings, tightened turning radii, play-backed public realms and continuous active-travel corridors.
4. Reallocate curb and storage space, require off-street car storage, expand shared car parking, and convert parking footprints to public space.

Ideas for further reading

1. Urban Playground: How Child-Friendly Planning and Design Can Save Cities – Book by Tim Gill
2. All to Play For: How to Design Child-friendly Housing – Book by Dinah Bornat
3. Movement: How to Take Back Our Streets and Transform Our Lives – Book by Marco te Brömmelstroet and Thalia Verkade
4. The Anxious Generation – Book by Jonathan Haidt
5. Mattioli, G., Roberts, C., Steinberger, J. K., & Brown, A. (2020). The political economy of car dependence: A systems of provision approach. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101486

Ideas for further research

1. Map children’s activity deserts, crash hotspots, parking appropriation and areas of concentrated socioeconomic vulnerability in a city and measure children’s independent mobility.
2. Evaluate cities/countries that adopted national/local regulatory levers (Denmark, Wales, Japan) to identify which elements drove change for child-friendly streets and how transferable they are.

The post Tim Gill • Last Child in the Street? Building the case for cities that truly put kids before cars appeared first on Gil Penalosa.